
Today’s Strategic Alignment Journal post in two sentences:
Difficulty tells us that something requires attention, but it does not tell us what is causing it. Before deciding to persist or change direction, determine whether you are dealing with a constraint, a misalignment or simply a requirement of the path you have chosen.
I recently read an article arguing that we can make success almost impossible by placing so many conditions around what we are willing to do that we eventually leave ourselves very few viable routes forward.
The author was writing about entrepreneurship, personality fit and the inevitability of hard work. His argument was that choosing something suited to our strengths, personality and desired lifestyle does not remove difficulty. We are still going to encounter things we would rather not do.
It made me think about alignment from another angle.
We often ask whether something fits.
- Does this opportunity fit my strengths?
- Does this role suit the way I work?
- Does this strategy fit the organization?
- Do we have the resources and capabilities to make it work?
- Does the direction align with what we are actually trying to achieve?
These are useful questions, but there is a risk in expecting alignment to remove friction.
- If I dislike selling, I could conclude that the business is wrong for me.
- If managing conflict makes me uncomfortable, I could decide that leadership is not a good fit.
- If implementation becomes considerably more difficult than anticipated, we might conclude that the strategy itself is wrong.
Any of those conclusions could be correct. They could also be completely wrong…because the presence of difficulty tells us that something requires our attention. It does not tell us whether the problem is the path itself, the way we are proceeding, or simply what the path requires of us.
Hard is information. It is not a diagnosis.
Difficulty can have many causes.
We may genuinely have chosen something poorly suited to our strengths, resources or circumstances. We may lack a capability that needs to be developed. Our expectations may have been unrealistic. The operating model may be flawed. We may have underestimated the resources required. The environment may have changed. Or we may simply have arrived at a part of the work that is difficult.
Those possibilities should not produce the same decision.
It is useful here to distinguish among a constraint, a misalignment and a requirement.
A constraint affects how we can proceed. Limited resources, timing, capacity or circumstances may require another route, a different pace or a smaller beginning.
A misalignment tells us that something about the route we have chosen does not adequately support where we are trying to go. That may require reconsideration or redesign.
A requirement is something the chosen route asks of us. It may involve learning something we do not know, doing something uncomfortable, developing a weak capability, repeating work long after the novelty has disappeared or tolerating uncertainty while results take time.
The problem begins when we mistake one for another.
- If we diagnose a requirement as a misalignment, we may abandon a perfectly viable direction because part of pursuing it is uncomfortable.
- If we diagnose a genuine misalignment as merely a requirement, we may keep pushing harder at something that needs to be reconsidered.
- And if we treat a constraint as a dead end, we may conclude that we cannot proceed when what is actually required is a different way forward.
This is why neither keep going nor change direction is particularly useful advice on its own.
Both can be excellent decisions. Both can also be expensive mistakes. So before deciding whether to persist, adjust or change direction, we need to identify first, what is actually causing the difficulty.
Strategic Reflection Prompt
Think about something in your work or business that currently feels harder than expected.
Is the difficulty a constraint that changes how you proceed, a misalignment that requires reconsideration, or a requirement of the path you have chosen?
Your answer may change what you decide to do next.
About Giselle
Most costly decisions begin with a wrong read of the situation.
I’m Giselle Hudson — The Pre-Fixer. I help leaders see the real problem before they act, in my writing and in my work. I don’t fix; I pre-fix. Most advisers jump to solutions before they’ve found the real problem. I find it first — the part that isn’t fully visible yet. Once we see that clearly, everything else falls into place, and confident, right action can follow.
Through my daily Strategic Alignment Journal, I explore leadership, decision-making, and the patterns that shape organizations — helping leaders make sense of complexity before they commit significant time and money to the wrong thing.
What’s the one thing about your business that frustrates you most — the thing that, despite your best efforts, you can’t seem to resolve?

